Objection Sustained Meaning In Court

When a lawyer objections to a question or a piece of evidence in a court of law, the judge must decide whether the objection is valid or not. If the judge decides that the objection is valid, they will say “objection sustained.” This means that the judge agrees with the lawyer who made the objection and the question or evidence in question is not allowed.

On the other hand, if the judge decides that the objection is not valid, they will say “objection overruled.” This means that the judge disagrees with the lawyer who made the objection and the question or evidence in question is allowed.

In the context of a courtroom, the phrase “objection sustained” is a significant one. It means that the lawyer who made the objection has successfully argued that the question or evidence is not relevant, is hearsay, or is otherwise inadmissible. As a result, the question or evidence is not allowed to be presented to the jury.

There are many different types of objections that a lawyer can make in a courtroom. Some common examples include:

• Hearsay: This is when a witness is testifying about something that they heard someone else say, rather than something that they directly observed.
• Relevance: This is when a question or piece of evidence is not relevant to the case at hand.
• Leading question: This is when a question is phrased in a way that suggests a particular answer.
• Assumes facts not in evidence: This is when a question assumes that certain facts are true, even though they have not been proven.

When a lawyer makes an objection, they must stand up and say “objection, your honor” and then state the basis for their objection. The judge will then consider the objection and make a decision.

It’s worth noting that the rules of evidence and the procedures for making objections can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of case. However, the basic principle of objection and ruling is the same in all courts.

In addition to the specific types of objections, there are also some general principles that guide the objection process. For example, a lawyer must make an objection in a timely manner, and must state the specific basis for the objection. If a lawyer fails to make an objection in a timely manner, they may waive their right to object.

It’s also worth noting that the objection process is not just about winning or losing, but about ensuring that the trial is fair and that justice is served. By allowing lawyers to object to questions and evidence, the court can help to ensure that the jury only considers relevant and reliable information.

In conclusion, the phrase “objection sustained” is an important part of the courtroom process. It allows lawyers to ensure that the evidence presented to the jury is fair and relevant, and that the questioning of witnesses is proper. By understanding the different types of objections and the procedures for making them, lawyers can help to ensure that justice is served.

FAQ Section

By following the procedures outlined above, lawyers can help to ensure that the trial is fair and that justice is served. Whether you’re a seasoned lawyer or just starting out, understanding the objection process is crucial to success in the courtroom.